A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Seized evidence No. 11 (S/N on Samsung mobile phones C, S/N) shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

On October 19, 2016, the Defendant, using Kwikset service, who is an organization of telecommunications fraud (hereinafter referred to as “scam”), proposed that 50,000 won per case will be paid as commission, and 50,000 won will be paid as 5-7% of the amount of money deposited into the relevant account by withdrawing the amount of damage deposited into the relevant account using a certain e-mail card, and accepted it.

1. On October 21, 2016, a staff member in charge of deceptioning the false name of fraud calls from the victim FF on or around October 21, 2016 to “50 million won, but has a lack of credit reputation.”

repayment of existing loans shall take place with a credit rating point:

A false statement was made to the effect that the withdrawal is possible to deposit money.

However, fact was that the employee in charge of phishing had no intention or ability to provide a loan to the victim, and was a plan to receive and use money from the victim.

Since then, around 14:58 on October 24, 2016, when receiving KRW 7,80,000 from the victim of G from around 14:58, G account under G’s name, G, the other withdrawal book, in accordance with the direction of the employee of the Red Cross, withdrawn KRW 7.8 million on October 25, 209:49 of the same year and deposit KRW 6,00,000,000,000 out of KRW 7.8 million on the same day in cash, and the Defendant, at around 11:16 on October 25, 2015, deposited KRW 50,000,000 in the Saemaul Bank account under the direction of the government branch office of the national bank at the 52,00,000,000,000 won in cash, using the name of the Saemaul Card and its deposit account in the name of the Defendant.

The Defendant, in collusion with E, nameless phishing staff, etc., by deceiving the victim by the above means, and by receiving 7,80,000 won from the damaged person, acquired it by deceiving the victim.

2. On October 25, 2016, the Defendant violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.