Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

피고인들은 2015. 10. 8. 20:30 경 인천 남동구 E에 있는 피해자 F(34 세) 의 부모가 운영하는 ‘G’ 식당에서 튀김, 술, 대하구 이 1kg 을 주문하여 먹은 후, 피고인 B이 가져온 새우 (3kg )를 구워 먹으려고 하였으나 위 식당의 종업원인 H로부터 1kg 당 1만 원의 요금을 내야 한다는 말을 듣자 피고인 A는 “ 이 씨 발 가자 안 먹는다 안 먹어, 이렇게 하는 것이 어딨냐

"" and the above restaurant was intended to leave the restaurant.

Accordingly, the employee could not pay money to the employee's horse to pay the food value, and the victim was "Isonnson."

The term "the defendant A" refers to "an governance or dissolution," and the defendant A made a conflict with the victim while the defendant B, who was in the next place, took the face of the victim several times, and the defendant A also took the face of the victim several times by drinking.

As a result, the Defendants jointly committed an injury to the victim, such as a crypt cryp, which requires treatment for about 30 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Each police statement made to H and I;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as photographs of injuries;

1. Relevant Article 2(2) and 2(1)3 of the former Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (amended by Act No. 13718, Jan. 6, 2016); Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 13718, Jan. 6, 2016);

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant A, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, committed a repeated crime during the period of suspension of execution, and Defendant B, during the period of repeated crime. There is a high possibility of criticism against the Defendants.

However, the defendants divided their mistakes and recognized their crimes.