beta
Text
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
1. According to the evidence of the grounds of appeal, although the defendant was asked about the past medical treatment, he/she made a false answer despite being asked about the past medical treatment, on April 25, 2010, he/she was released from the hospital on April 29, 2010, and was insured on April 29, 2010, four days after he/she was discharged from the hospital, and on April 29, 2010, he/she was insured on the "LIG 100 years old," which was the cause of the claim for the insurance money, the "SISI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SIsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
2. Judgment on the prosecutor's assertion
A. The facts charged of not guilty (1) The primary defendant was diagnosed on October 13, 2008 by a traffic accident, and was diagnosed by a half-month fluorm fluor, etc. on the left-hand slot, and on January 4, 2009 and the same year.
3. On March 17, 2009, through the second round of 26.2, the applicant received a diagnosis, such as a re-satisfination on the left satisf, the left satisf, and received a diagnosis and treatment related to the above injury until April 25, 2009.
On April 29, 2009, the Defendant called the Victim LIG Damage Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim”) to the victim LIG Damage Insurance Co., Ltd., and received medical treatment from a physician due to a general injury by making the insured, the insured, the insured, and the insured as the Defendant, was subscribed to the insurance under the name of “(free) LIG Life Insurance 100 years old (hereinafter “instant insurance”) that guarantees the full amount of medical expenses actually borne by the insured. In such a case, the Defendant has a legal obligation to notify the insurer of important matters that may have a significant influence in determining whether to conclude the insurance contract, including the fact that he/she received surgery in the course of consultation prior to the conclusion of the contract.