A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a 124ccifa, without registration, in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Driving of Danger).

On July 21, 2016, the Defendant had a duty of care to observe traffic signals and prevent accidents by accurately manipulatinging the steering direction and brake system of the vehicle on the side of the Southern-gu, Gwangju, a 180-distance intersection from the southnam University. The location was a private-distance intersection where signal lights are installed, and the Defendant had a duty of care to observe traffic signals and prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded to the without-light stadium from the side of Gwangju metropolitan basin by negligence in violation of the vehicle signal while the vehicle signal was put to a stop signal while it was difficult to drive in a normal condition due to alcohol concentration of 0.179%.

C Driving received the front part of the instant taxi in front of the Defendant’s driving, with the front part of the Defendant’s driving.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to victims E (V, 20 years of age) who was on the part of Defendant's driver's Obatoba, such as multi-faceted bid and injury for about two weeks of medical treatment.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and violation of the Road Traffic Act (Dless Driving) were driven by the Defendant without a motor device driver’s license, without a motor device under the influence of alcohol 0.179% from the section of approximately 2 km from the distance of 0.179% from the distance of 2km from the front side of the Southern-dong University of Gwangjubuk-dong, Gwangju to the place indicated in paragraph (1) at the time and time.

3. Defendant 1, who violated the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, is a holder of an erroneous soil contamination as stated in paragraph (1).

No motor vehicle owner shall operate any motor vehicle that is not covered by mandatory insurance.

The Defendant operated Otoba without mandatory insurance at the date, time, and place specified in paragraph (1).

(i) the evidence;