Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the Defendant at the D convenience store located in Suwon-si C on the ground that the victim E (43 tax) takes a desire to do so, and (b) made the face of the victim two times by drinking.
As a result, the defendant suffered bodily injury from the victim's 2ndes of the number of days of treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the part of violence;
1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. Where the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] general injury [the scope of recommendation] [the person subject to special mitigation] is also responsible for the occurrence of a crime or the expansion of damage to the victim] The defendant exercised violence as stated in the judgment of the victim [the decision of sentence]. The defendant exercised violence as stated in the judgment of the victim. The victim did not suffer from injury, did not recover damage, did not receive a letter from the victim, did not have any record of punishment exceeding a fine, the defendant did not have any record of punishment exceeding a fine, and there was no record of punishment beyond a fine, considering such factors as the defendant had no record of punishment for violent crime, other circumstances that may be taken into account as other circumstances where the defendant and the victim are challenged, and all the sentencing conditions as shown in the record and the theory of change, such as other circumstances where the defendant are challenged.