logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.09.12 2013고단3684
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 28, 2010, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on December 19, 201, a summary order of KRW 1 million to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on December 19, 201, and on November 30, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1 million to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on November 30, 2012.

Criminal facts

On May 17, 2013, the Defendant, without a driver’s license of a car around 06:58, driven C-low vehicle at approximately 5 km from the road front of the south illegal landing place located in Daegu Suwon-gu, to the front road of the 2nd Geong apartment located in the same Gu, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.065%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Inquiry into the result of the crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Report on the circumstances of an employee;

1. The register of suspect's driver's licenses;

1. Disqualifications of the main office;

1. Previous records: Application of inquiry reports on criminal records, etc., investigation reports (like records of a suspect and attachment of judgment) and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is limited to the defendant's liability for the reason of sentencing, the defendant's blood alcohol concentration is not high, the defendant's support for his wife immediately after childbirth and her newborn baby is a situation in which the defendant must support her wife and her newborn baby, her age, occupation, family relationship, etc., shall be determined as ordered

arrow