The punishment of the accused shall be set forth in six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 13, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on July 12, 2019, due to a crime of violating the Fishery Resources Management Act, etc. in the Daegu District Court Port Branch Branch on September 13, 2018.

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle B or knife in Grandland.

On November 18, 2018, at around 16:25, the Defendant driven the said maid vehicle with the blood alcohol concentration of 0.122%, and driven the front of the D Office located in the south-gu C at the port of port at a speed that would not be known to the shot (YY) of the YYYYYY, the Defendant driven the said maid vehicle at a speed that would not be able to know from

At this point, there were other automobiles, thus, they had a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the steering system by reducing speed and accurately manipulating the steering and brakes while living well around the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and found it late to stop a victim E (W, 51 years old) driving, which was driven by negligence without properly examining the front line, and received a driver after driving the said vehicle with the front line of the said passenger vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, injury to the victim E, about two weeks of a maluted glock bed, which requires treatment for about two weeks, injury to the victim G (the 47 years of age) who is the passenger of the said vehicle, such as bones salt, etc. requiring treatment for about two weeks, and injury to the victim H (the 45 years of age) who is the passenger of the said vehicle, in need of treatment for about two weeks.

2. On November 18, 2018, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at around 16:25, the Defendant driven a 500-meter radius from the J cafeteria located in the south-gu Seoul metropolitan area I to the front road of the D Office in C, while driving the Grand City.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;