The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentence (one year and four months of imprisonment, and confiscation) on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment shows the attitude of the defendant to accept and reflect his mistake, agreed with some victims, and made money deposited for the rest victims, etc.

However, this case, however, is a theft of property by the defendant's intrusion upon another person's residence together on three occasions, and the nature and result of the crime is not weak in light of the contents and result of the crime, and the method of the crime.

In addition, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime and has several criminal records of the same kind, and the crime of this case also constitutes a repeated crime of the same kind.

In light of the above circumstances favorable or unfavorable to the defendant, and the age, sex, environment, and all other conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable since it is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.