logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원속초지원 2019.07.19 2016가단301617
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The plaintiff A, B, F, and G's lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The Defendant: (a) KRW 300,000 for each of the Plaintiff C, D, and E and its related thereto on December 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 18, 2014, at around 11:20, the road in front of the 8th group of Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun, was driven along one lane from both sides to the west, and the part behind the I.S. M. car (hereinafter “victim”) of Plaintiff A (hereinafter “the instant accident”) driven by a shocking vehicle (hereinafter “victim”), which was parked in the signal route, following the lower part of the Plaintiff’s I.S. car (hereinafter “victim”) which was parked in the signal route, and Plaintiff A suffered from the injury, such as a f.m., the c., the f., the f., the f., the f.m., the f., the f., and the f., the f.m., the f.,

B. Plaintiff C, D, and E are the children of Plaintiff A, Plaintiff F, and Plaintiff B are the children of Plaintiff B, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Maritime Vehicle.

C. On July 2015, Plaintiff A entered into an agreement as described in attached Form (1) with the Defendant (hereinafter “Agreement”) and received KRW 20 million from the Defendant on July 31, 2015.

At the time of the first agreement, Plaintiffs C, D, and E were adults.

Plaintiff

B A around February 2015, an agreement as described in attached Form 2 (hereinafter “Agreement 2”) with the Defendant (hereinafter “Agreement 1”) was entered into between the Defendant and the Defendant, and was paid KRW 32 million by the Defendant on February 11, 2015.

At the time of the second agreement, Plaintiff F and G were respective minors.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Gap evidence No. 5, Gap evidence No. 7, Eul evidence No. 1 (including provisional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs' assertion that damages occurred due to the accident of this case is KRW 21,639,730 (i.e., 11,639,730 consolation money of KRW 10,00,000), and KRW 43,977,426 to the plaintiff Eul (i.e., 33,977,426 consolation money of KRW 10,000), and the plaintiff C, D, E, F, and G are liable to pay 3,00,00 consolation money and damages for delay.

3. According to the facts based on which the defendant's main defense was based, each of the agreements in this case is stated.

arrow