Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, the defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B A is a person who employs the number of full-time workers and engages in an individual construction business, and Defendant A is a person who is employed by the “C” for about four years prior to his employment.

Defendant

B On May 2019, in Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, a building owner: (a) entrusted the construction of a studio building from E to a site manager; and (b) on September 2019, the building owner continued to be appointed from E to F even after the change from E to F, and continued to perform the said construction and continued to perform the said construction; and (c) on November 201, 2019, the owner requested the “C” to install steel structure on the outer wall of the building during the said construction.

Defendant

B around November 20, 2019, around 16:00, on the fourth floor of the building in the construction site at the above site, the Defendant A instructed the Defendant A to install steel-frame structures on the outer wall of the building, and the Defendant A, in accordance with the said direction, was engaged in the melting work using an electrical equipment to connect the steel-frame to the outer wall of the building.

There was a sti pumps on the 1st floor of the building, and there was a risk of fire because the melting stike on the 4th floor of the building might be separated from the sti pumps loaded on the 1st floor of the building, so in such a case, the Defendants had a duty of care to take protective measures, such as removing combustible materials around the workplace and covering the combustible materials by preventing spread if it is difficult to remove the stike, etc., and to prevent fire by placing a fire extinguisher around the workplace.

Nevertheless, the Defendants did not take protective measures such as removing or preventing the sti pumps, etc., but did not take protective measures such as covering the sti pumps around the workplace, due to the occupational negligence of carrying out the stike work without placing the fire extinguisher around the workplace, and Defendant A left the sti pumps on the first floor of the building while melting by using the electric equipment.

Ultimately, the Defendants are the defendants.