beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. The grounds for the court's explanation concerning this case are as stated in the part of the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding the following items to the end of Paragraph (2) of Article 8 of the Administrative Litigation Act and Paragraph (2) of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. As such, the plaintiff added items (c) of the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance to the end of Paragraph (2) of Article 8 of the Administrative Litigation Act and Paragraph (2) of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 2. The plaintiff stated that the father of the court of first instance who recommended him/her to open to the end of Paragraph (c) of the judgment of the court of first instance is Eul, and that the above item's statement, etc. (No. 5-1, No. 6-1, and hereinafter referred to as "the written statement of this case").
(C) In light of the following: (a) the Plaintiff’s signature, which was sent to the instant written statement, is different from the Plaintiff’s visa application data (Evidence B No. 5); and (b) the e-mail indicated at the bottom of the instant written statement, “C” appears to have been used by “C” before applying for refugee status; and (c) it is difficult to believe the content of the instant written statement in light of the fact that the said application was not accepted; and (e) the Plaintiff is residing in Ecuador.
The conflict with Islamic scholars asserts that they entered the Republic of Korea with the aid of B, which is a fatherant to E church, and, considering the fact that Luacuacian is located in the south, the southwest, and the southwest of Luacian, and the difference between them, and that he has a relatively low distance of distance (Evidence B No. 3), the plaintiff could continue his religious life in Canari, unless there are special circumstances.
3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance with the same conclusion is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.