Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 3, 2015, the Defendant’s defect in order to verify the details of the report by the police box C (a police box affiliated with the police box) assigned to the field after receiving 112 reports in the elevator of the first floor parking lot for B commercial buildings underground at the time of the strike around 23:40 on October 3, 2015

It is why they have been why they had been.

’ 고 욕설하며 D의 정강이를 발로 차고 현행 범인으로 체포될 수 있음을 고지하자 누워서 D의 허벅지와 허리 등을 수회 발로 차고 같은 파출소 소속 경위 E의 좌측 종아리와 낭 심 등을 발로 찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement made to F, G, H, D, and E;

1. 수사보고(� 장 CCTV)

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides for the following: (a) considering the characteristics of the instant crime committed by a police officer with the reason for sentencing of the Defendant’s lawful performance of official duties; (b) considering the Defendant’s agreement with the police officers after the closure of the trial; (c) the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime; (d) the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime; and (e) there was no record of the instant crime that the Defendant would pay attention to the instant crime; and (e) taking account of the Defendant’s age, sex, family relation, criminal history, the background of the instant case, and the following circumstances, the sentence like the order shall be determined.

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. On October 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) requested the Victim F (19) who does not have any day-to-day meals before the elevator elevator of the first floor of the commercial building B at Papju City on October 23:20, 2015; (b) delayed after demanding the Plaintiff to do so; and (c) “Isle immediately after the instant ring-to- day.”

“The victim F will be the head of “the principal of the household” as the principal of the household.