The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not go beyond the fences installed by the victim with the vehicle, but otherwise, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., the victim D stated that the defendant was able to take the fences with the wheels of 3 to 4 times, and that the victim was the defendant (the victim stated that he was aware that he was the defendant, and that G, who was the victim at the time of witness, was the victim, was the victim of the crime immediately committed the crime in this case) the victim's son, who was the victim's son, was present at the scene of the crime, that the victim's son was able to take a view to the fact that he was able to take a view of the same kind of strings as the victim's wheel, and that the victim was able to take a favorable statement to the victim as at the time of the crime, and that he was able to have a view that he was able to have a string on the day when he was able to have a string of the vehicle with the victim, and that he was able to install the cement on the day of this case.