The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment below seems to have sentenced the above punishment by comprehensively taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant (the fact that the defendant recognized all the crimes of this case, the economic value of the stolen victim, and the fact that the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case for living) and unfavorable circumstances (the defendant committed the crime of larceny repeatedly without being weighted even during the same repeated period, and did not reach an agreement with the victims, and did not recover from damage).

In light of the aforementioned grounds for sentencing and the defendant's age, career, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, various circumstances revealed by the circumstances after the crime, and other circumstances, the scope of sentencing recommended by the Sentencing Committee (one month to one month of imprisonment) in the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court and the fact that there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that the court below did not change the sentence against the defendant, the sentencing of the court below shall be appropriate, and it shall not be deemed that it abused its discretion or deviates from the limits of discretion.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.