logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.12.12 2018노3003
예배방해등
Text

All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. (1) The Defendant (misunderstanding of facts) interference (2017 order 3484, 7559, 7506, 7929, 2018 order 922) did not have an intention to interfere with worship. The Defendant’s act was conducted in the process of responding to a universal answer made during a tugboat or the Defendant’s person who interferes with worship by probing time. Thus, it does not go against the social rules.

(2) Violence (2107 Highest 6355, 6447, 6857, 7324, 7506) was committed by the Defendant. The Defendant’s act committed against the victim M, I, and N is not an exercise of tangible power that can be seen as assault, and is not contrary to social norms.

(3) The Defendant’s remarks (2017 senior group 6857, 7439, 7738, 7929, 7929, 7951, 2018 senior group 493) merely were made with a view to hearing and admonitioning the Defendant’s insulting speech and behavior against the Defendant, or the Defendant’s act did not go against the social rules.

(4) Property damage (2017 high group 7747) E was caused inconvenience to the members of the church second floor entrance, and the members did not temporarily set the church opening hours as a temporary measure for the loss of the gate, depending on the fact that 80 members were the members, and later, the Defendant did not have the intention of damage and did not go against the social rules.

(5) Violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) [2017 Highest 7929, 7951] Defendant stated facts, and there was no purpose of slandering.

In addition, in order to promote the public interest for the normalization of Korea church, the illegality of E pastors, S, and I is excluded.

(6) Violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (2017 Highest 7929) (the Defendant sent letters to deliver the Defendant’s intent while going against the S and church problems, not to act to cause apprehensions, but to social norms.

arrow