The defendant shall disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence against the defendant.

1. Around February 7, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 21:40 on the charge, the Defendant: (b) destroyed a turf with a turf with a turf with a turf with a total floor area of 3 square meters, which was in possession of a turf with a turf with a turf with a common property managed by the Seoan City.

2. The offense of setting fire to a general object as prescribed by Article 167(1) of the Criminal Act shall not be punished unless there is no intention of an actor of the occurrence of public danger, or unless there is any public danger, for the crime of setting fire to a general object.

However, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged through the records of this case, namely, ① the Defendant stated that he flabed in carcine in a flabation and a good memory, ② the Defendant’s act was incinerated, but there was no hindrance to the growth of trees, and there was no removal of trees. ③ The two fire officers covered by PPP ex son within the pumps and covered by the PPP ex son in the pumps, and caused one minute to completely suppress the residues of water, ④ The place where the Defendant flabed or did not live in the surrounding house, ④ the chemical unit in which the Defendant flabed, and the place where flabed, was located, ⑤ the danger of the Defendant’s act of fire prevention, or the Defendant’s intent to commit it is difficult to readily conclude that there was no other evidence to prove that there was no other specific intent to commit it.

3. According to the conclusion, the above facts charged constitute a time when there is no proof of crime, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and a summary of the judgment of innocence against the defendant pursuant to