The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that Defendant A talked through Defendant B, who was the victim of organized violence, without directly talking with I in connection with the water supply of water and talked through Defendant B, etc., despite the fact that the victim’s statement can be sufficiently recognized, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged in this case, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case 1) Defendant A’s Magazin Park Jong-gu, Busan, a “F” in the name of “F,” and the Defendant produced water for recycling, and supplied water for recycling to an entertainment shop in the Hansan-gu, Busan. The Defendant attempted to keep the victim I (the Defendant was to deliver water for recycling 30 years of age) to the customer, such as the entertainment tavern located in G, the Busan, where he supplied water for eating and drinking. The Defendant attempted to keep the victim from delivering water by threatening B, who was affiliated with the “Y”, the Busan, the violence organization of the Busan, which was known to, and known, the Busan, from delivering water for eating and drinking.

On 2010, the Defendant called to B, “I want to deal with young pets with other young pets in Korea. I ask B to find out who is difficult to enter into the customer,” and ordered B B to attack the victim, and B, upon the Defendant’s order, sent the victim through J, who was known to the ordinary erode in the field of the mutual influent horse in Busan Metropolitan City Gu G, in accordance with the Defendant’s order, and supplied the victim’s profits in lieu of the market value by having the victim acquire property profits on behalf of the victim.”

In this respect, the Defendant had B.