1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an individual entrepreneur who manufactures and sells wood-type and gold-type products with the trade name of “B,” and the Defendant is a company that manufactures air conditioners and manufactures air conditioners.

B. Around August 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant on the production and delivery of the wooden type that the Defendant ordered for the manufacture of his/her product, gold-type, tpanty type, tpanty type, etc.

C. On August 8, 2016, the Plaintiff supplied a wooden punishment to the Defendant, and received 17.60,000 won (including value-added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply) from the Defendant on August 9, 2016. On September 2, 2016, the Plaintiff revised and re-processed the said wooden punishment at the Defendant’s request, and received KRW 1.21,00 won from the Defendant on September 13, 2016.

On September 22, 2016, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant a gold-type and tpanty gold-type to the Defendant on the same day (i.e., KRW 1210,000 won in a gold-type 1,650,000 in a gold-type 1,210,000 in a gold-type 1.65 million in a gold-type tpanty), and on September 30, 2016, supplied the Defendant with the tpanty gold-type to the Defendant on the same day, and received 1,760,000 won

[Ground of Recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 4 (including each number), Gap evidence 6, Eul evidence 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion asserts that, as above, the Plaintiff paid the price of supplied goods from the Defendant (i.e., KRW 1.7,590,000, KRW 1.21210,000, KRW 1.21650,000, KRW 1.26660,000, KRW 1.2660,000, KRW 4,8440,000 in addition to the price of supplied goods (i.e., KRW 1., KRW 528,000, KRW 2750,000), and accordingly, the Defendant is liable to pay the Plaintiff the above KRW 484,00

On September 17, 2016, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to revise and reprocessing the first type of timber (12.10,000 won) at the Defendant’s request, and the Plaintiff revised and reprocessing the second type of timber (1.210,000 won) by paying 1.210,000 won to the Plaintiff.