A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Pinyl chloride for a single-use vinyl seized (No. 4) and mask for a single-use can be used.

Punishment of the crime

In order to raise money due to the overdue payment of card bills, the Defendant prepared criminal tools, such as the victim G (the age of 78) who mixedly operated the “F Schlage” in Gangseo-gu Seoul, his residence, with the intent of taking property from the victim G (the age of 78), the Defendant prepared for the crime, such as the plastic wall (No. 4), the plastic wall (Evidence No. 5), the stamper (the length of 30cm).

At around 20:20 on May 15, 2014, the Defendant entered the “F Schlage” 20:20, the Defendant brought the victim seated in the room, “dis fluor liquor tax”. To find tobacco, the Defendant brought the victim to the victim’s left hand who saw the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the 2014, and brought the 200,000 won in cash from the front part of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the 2 week.

Accordingly, the defendant took the victim's property by carrying a deadly weapon, and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. On-site identification reports, investigation reports (the routes and places of movement of a suspect before and after committing the crime), and investigation reports (the voluntary submission of reports, such as arrival of a suspect, etc. when committing the crime);

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 337 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 337 of the Election of Imprisonment;

2. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

3. Since the official’s failure to comply with the confiscation requirement cannot be deemed as satisfying all the requirement of confiscation, such as an examination color shot (Evidence No. 1), examination color shot (Evidence No. 2) and examination color shot (Evidence No. 3).