1. The defendant jointly with F (G) and jointly with the plaintiff A 20,159,561 won, the plaintiff B, and D respectively 1,00,000 won, and the plaintiff C, and E.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. In the event of an injury, the Plaintiff A entered the Gun and served in the first group of the Marine Corps 7 joint information and communication department of the Marine Corps.

Plaintiff

At around 21:00 on October 22, 2013, F (G) as an appointed soldier of A, was coming from the said Plaintiff’s life room around the said Plaintiff’s 9 unit, fixing his body on a two-way bridge, and blabing one of his arms into two arms, and plucking off “A” technology, which is called “Abrob”. The above Plaintiff’s head debt, knenee, and knee-knee-knee-knee-knee-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-k

B. On November 20, 2014, F was convicted of the above injury and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1 million, and the above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

Daejeon District Court 2014 High Court 973 c)

On October 29, 2013, the Plaintiff A received a stimulative stimulsive stimulsive stimulsive stimulsive stimulsive stimulsive stimulsa at the Stimule Hospital of the Malisa.

At present, the above plaintiff shows the symptoms of the clothes of the Gyeongdo in the right city, the external resignation (the long distance), and the external resignation (the basis). D.

The plaintiffs related plaintiffs B and D are the mother, father, and plaintiffs C and E are women and children of plaintiffs A.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1-11, the result of the commission of physical examinations to the director of the National University of Esatisfy, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The injury inflicted by F, a soldier belonging to the Defendant for the State’s liability to compensate for damage, by assaulting the Plaintiff A, who was a successor in a military life room in the army, constitutes an official tort.

In common with F, the defendant is liable to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the above injury in accordance with the main sentence of Article 2 (1) of the State Compensation Act.

나. 피고의 주장에 대한 판단 ⑴ 직무집행관련성 유무 ㈎ 피고는, 이 사건은 장병...