1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From September 1, 1969 to November 3, 1980, the Plaintiff worked as the Korea Coal Corporation's coal mining center and the Korea Coal Corporation's central mining center, and the mining and digging galleries.

B. On October 5, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a medical care benefit application with the Defendant around December 18, 2014, on the following grounds: (a) as a result of the examination, such as the radon cansy examination of both sides, the physical heat examination of hostile ships, and the negosy examination, etc. (hereinafter “instant injury”); and (b) on the basis of the determination result of the Seoul Committee for Determination of Industrial Disease that the Plaintiff cannot recognize the instant injury and disease as an occupational disease; (c) on February 5, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision not to grant medical care in accordance with the determination result, etc. of the Seoul Committee for Determination of Occupational Disease that the Plaintiff cannot recognize the injury and disease as an occupational disease.

C. Around June 24, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for medical care benefits with the same content as the Defendant, but the Defendant rendered a decision on June 25, 2015 on the rejection of re-approval for medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, 2, Gap evidence 2, 3, and 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff was exposed to a very severe vibration by digging, collecting coal, installing a mine pit support unit, and strengthening the mine galleries in the form of three bridges every 8 hours a day in the working environment in the coal mine where there is a serious difference between the outside and the temperature and the very cold and frozen environment.

As a result, there was a symptoms showing a low color change, and the symptoms continued after retirement and received the diagnosis of the injury and disease in the National University Hospital.

Therefore, even though the injury and disease of this case has a proximate causal relation with the plaintiff's work, the disposition of this case made by the defendant on different premise is unlawful.

B. From September 1, 1969 to November 3, 1980, the Plaintiff’s judgment is made for 11 years and 2 months from September 1, 1969.