All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. As to the violation of the Public Official Election Act according to the election campaign prior to the election campaign period as of October 13, 201 among the facts charged in this case of mistake of facts, according to the CV and CW’s statements, this part of the facts charged can be found guilty.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which acquitted this part of the facts charged is erroneous as affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentencing of the lower court (two years of imprisonment, three years of suspended execution) is too uneasible and unfair.

나. 피고인 ⑴ 사실오인 ㈎ 기부행위에 따른 공직선거법위반의 점 이 사건 중국세미나 및 그 참석자에 관한 여행경비 지원은 공직선거법에 의하여 금지된 기부행위가 아니다.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant to have made a contribution by subsidizing the travel expenses to the residents of the petition-gun through F, and found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged is erroneous in the misapprehension of the facts, which affected

㈏ 사전선거운동에 따른 공직선거법위반의 점 2011. 9. 22.자 사전선거운동에 따른 공직선거법위반의 점에 부합하는 AB에 대한 경찰 진술조서는 원심법정에서 AB가 증인으로 출석하여 그 내용을 부인하였고 나아가 특히 신빙할 수 있는 상태에서 진술이 이루어진 것이 아니므로 그 증거능력이 없다.

In addition, it is not enough to recognize that the remaining evidence produced by the court below is the defendant's prior election campaign from April 12, 201 to April 15 of the same month and each violation of the Public Official Election Act under the prior election campaign from September 22, 2011.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found this part of the facts charged guilty is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the judgment.

㈐ 유사기관설치에 따른 공직선거법위반의 점 피고인이 M 사무실을 임차하여 정식으로 선거사무소로 등록하기 이전에는 위 사무실을 선거사무소와...