Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in Csch Rex ES350.

around 15:59 on October 20, 2015, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle of the above director, and led the front-way road D located in Incheon Southern-gu to the police box for the use of the motor vehicle on the ground of bail.

A person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by operating direction, etc. so that it does not interfere with normal driving vehicles when entering the lane, or by driving the vehicle safely and safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was driven by the Victim F (42) who was directed to the station box located on the right side of the G-learning car, which had been driven by the Defendant F (42). The lower part of the said G-learning car was the front part of the F-V car.

From around 16:00 on the same day, on the roads front of the point of South Korea of the National Bank of Korea, the National Bank of Yong-gu, Incheon, Incheon, 16:00, in order to prevent the flex motor vehicle and re-consign the fluence motor vehicle of the victim who stopped.

Ultimately, as seen above, the Defendant suffered injury, such as salt panscule, which requires two weeks of treatment by occupational negligence, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the motor vehicle and providing relief to the injured party, even after destroying the repair cost equivalent to KRW 482,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A survey report on actual condition (referring to a net seven times);

1. A written diagnosis (F) and written estimate (G);

1. Ebbbbbling images [the defendant and defense counsel] had weak ability to discern things or make a decision by misunderstanding the spirit and medicine of the defendant at the time of committing the instant crime, such as exemption from water to drink, etc.

The argument is asserted.

According to the records, the defendant was exempted from water for not less than 10 years due to non-quality non-explosion, etc. at the time of the crime of this case.