logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2015.07.24 2015고정467
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a B 27 tons truck for Korean commercial use.

On March 27, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on March 18:48, 2015, and changed the course to a two-lane road in front of the Djust station in the luminous City C at a speed that would not be known by the one-lane distance intersection from the front of the lutolust.

In this case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to inform the direction change in advance and to change the course safely by taking into account the traffic situation of the front and rear left.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to change the course of the Defendant’s vehicle to the left side of the FJ car driven by the victim E (IS, 40 years old) who is driving in the same direction two-lanes on the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, suffered from the brain, spathy, spathy, spathy, and spathy spathy spathy, and spathy spathy spathy, and escaped without taking necessary measures at the scene while carrying out the incidental traffic accident to cover KRW 430,438, such as the victim’s tea spathy.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A traffic accident report (one report);

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2) (actual survey report);

1. Traffic accident evidence photographs;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the written estimate for vehicle maintenance;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of failing to take measures after causing damage and destruction);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow