logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.06.01 2017고단5486
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On November 16, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Military Service Act at the Seoul Northern District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Military Service Act, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 5, 2018.

[Criminal facts]

1. On March 13, 2017, the Defendant’s fraud against the victim C was connected to the website of “D”’s Internet camping goods transaction at a place at the morning, and sold at KRW 220,000,000.

The message was sent to the effect that the victim C, who reported and contacted the above writing, sent a message to the effect that “I would send the message to selectively if you send the message.”

However, at the time of fact, the Defendant’s punishment was owned by Aom gab, but the Defendant was not permitted to sell the gab from his own punishment, and the Defendant did not possess an Aom gab at the time, so even if receiving the price from the injured party, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to sell the gab.

On March 13, 2017, the Defendant received KRW 220,000,00 from the Defendant’s account in the name of the Defendant, as the purchase price of the GEB in the name of the Defendant, on March 13, 2017.

2. On April 14, 2017, the Defendant’s fraud against the victim E was connected to the used goods trading site called the “China country” at an insular place, and then sold in 1.50,00 won so far as gallon jus would be sold.

The message was sent to the victim E, who reported and contacted the above text, and sent a message to the effect that “If you send the price, you would send it to s 6 in gallon.”

However, the same goods are sold to many people of the defendant at the time of fact.

There was no intention or ability to sell Soviet 6 Sogal ju to the victim even if he received the price from the victim and received the price from the victim.

On April 14, 2017, the Defendant, as such, made a false statement to the victim, was in order to have a community credit cooperative account in the name of the Defendant, in a galloning manner.

arrow