1. The Defendant’s KRW 150,000,000 per annum for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from January 1, 2019 to January 15, 2019.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On January 30, 2018, the representative director of the Defendant Company, died on June 29, 2015, the amount of KRW 60 million on June 29, 2015, KRW 30 million on October 2, 2016, and the date of lending KRW 50 million on August 7, 2017, the Plaintiff specified the date of lending KRW 50 million on August 8, 2017, but the said date was deposited in C’s passbook. Since the date on which the Plaintiff actually delivered KRW 50 million on August 7, 2017 (Evidence 13).

50 million won was lent.

B. For the payment of the above loan debt, the representative director C of the defendant company issued two copies of the number of shares per defendant and delivered them to the plaintiff as follows.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant check number”. ① The date of issuance of the check number per face value of KRW 100 million on December 30, 2018, the date of issuance of the check number of KRW 100 million on December 30, 2016, and the two-year extension on December 30, 2018, and the date of publication: The date of issuance of the check number of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D: F (2) the amount of face value of KRW 50 million on face value: the date of issuance of the check number of KRW 50 million on December 30, 2017: the date of issuance of the check number of KRW 100 million on December 30, 2017; and the date of issuance: Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu D Bank’s number and number of the check number of KRW 50 million on December 30, 2018;

C. On December 31, 2018, the Plaintiff presented to E Bank, a payment bank, a payment bank, two copies of the instant schedule of shares, but the said bank rejected the payment on the receipt of the report of acceptance from the Defendant.

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1, 11, 10, 13, 14, and evidence Nos. 6-1, 2, 3, 12-1, 2, 3, and 4-2 of the evidence Nos. 12-1, 4-2, and 4-2 of the evidence Nos. 6-2, and the above part is clearly written by Eul in the lower part of the evidence Nos. 4. 3, and therefore, the defendant's assertion that the date on which the actual issuance of the check of this case is around May 2, 201

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant as the issuer of the check of this case, barring any special circumstance, shall be the plaintiff.