A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who is engaged in driving of a wing and cargo vehicle in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act (unclaimed Measures after Accidents);

On February 23, 2014, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle at around 03:30, and proceeded along the three-lane road in the middle of the Simsan City, the two-lane road of the K-Swiss, front of the K-Swis, in the middle of the Simsan City.

At the same time, there was an intersection where signal lights are installed, so there was a duty of care to reduce the speed and prevent accidents in advance by properly examining the front side of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant got off the back part of the E-ro taxi driven by the victim D, who was in the traffic signal atmosphere due to negligence while driving on the brea while under the influence of alcohol, and received the back part of the E-ro taxi in front of the cargo vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the sculatory scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics with which the number of treatment days cannot be known by occupational negligence as seen above, and at the same time, even if the above taxi was damaged to be 245,638 won, such as the exchange of scopic scopics, and escaped without any measures necessary to rescue the

2. On February 23, 2014, at around 04:27, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the measurement of drinking), the Defendant was required to comply with the measurement of drinking alcohol by inserting approximately 30 minutes in a breath of the police box, when there exist reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as a flag, red, and a blag.

Nevertheless, the defendant continued to refuse to comply with a police officer's request for a drinking test without any justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of Statement of Police with D 1.