A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 11:50 on December 6, 2019, the Defendant, at the “D” restaurant operated by the Victim B (L, 62 years of age), and on the ground that the victim was kidding another person, caused the victim to inflict an injury by cutting down the victim’s head head, skeing the victim’s head, cutting off by hand the strings of the victim’s head, and cutting off the string with the iron, which is a dangerous object, once again, after gathering the victim’s head, and then causing the victim to inflict an injury, such as cutting down the left-hand fel that requires approximately four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness B and E;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. A medical certificate of injury and a medical certificate;

1. On-site photographs, photographs of criminal tools, photographs of the victim's body, and photographs;

1. Determination as to the Defendant and defense counsel’s assertion in the 112 Reporting Case Handling List

1. Although the main point of the argument lies in the victim's hair and breath, the victim's hair and breath cane, the victim's bombation does not contain the bombial bomb or bomb.

2. In full view of the following circumstances that can be recognized by the evidence duly admitted and examined by this court, the defendant can sufficiently recognize the fact that the defendant was injured by the victim by putting the victim a fluorial fluor and fluoring the victim's arms once as stated in its reasoning.

The defendant and defense counsel are not accepted.

① The victim has consistently stated in an investigative agency and this court specifically and consistently on the grounds and the process of the occurrence of a dispute between the Defendant and the investigative agency, the method of the commission of the offense by the Defendant, and the circumstances leading up to fit the left part of the Defendant’s trade.

The statements made between the victim's investigative agency and this court are credibility because it is difficult to find the reason or motive for the victim to make a false statement in order to punish the defendant.

(2) A witness E shall be the defendant in this court.