1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

3. The total cost of the lawsuit.

A. On October 29, 2007, a management and disposal plan including the estimated amount of a building site or structure, the estimated amount of the rearrangement project cost (total project cost), and the amount of, and the timing for, the sharing of the partnership members (hereinafter “previous management and disposal plan”). On October 29, 2007, a general meeting held to complete a resolution on the previous management and disposal plan, and obtained authorization from the Sungnam City on March 27, 2008.

Article 5. Design for Sale

1. Supply scale: 15 units, two underground floors, to 748 units on the ground and other welfare facilities; and

3. The size and supply price of each unit of welfare facilities (unit size: 1,426.38.47.14, 378.61 (unit size: : 537.47.14.14, 378.61 (unit size)) store for the use of the site area of the second floor of the first floor for each person subject to supply by each person subject to sale * The size and supply price of each unit of welfare facilities shall be determined after the execution design is determined, and the amount of association members and general sale shall be determined within the scope of the appraised value of intangible assets.* Welfare facilities shall be sold in lots through separate consultation pursuant to Article 46

* After the separate consultation in accordance with the articles of incorporation of this case, the area number shares shall be determined.

Article 6 Estimated Amount of the land or structure scheduled for parcelling-out by person subject to parcelling-out

2. The sale area and value of building facilities and welfare facilities for 2-4 commercial buildings shall be sold in lots in a separate consultation pursuant to subparagraph 6 of Article 46 of the articles of association of this case.

2) The main contents of the previous management and disposal plan are as follows. (e) The agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendants, including the preparation of a written agreement and the resolution of the board of representatives, are as follows. On the other hand, on March 3, 2008, Defendant B invested 280.9 square meters in the land lot No. 1 on Seongbuk-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which was owned by Defendant B, and 932.43 square meters in the building No. 93, and the Plaintiff invested in the Plaintiff on March 3, 2008, the exclusive area No. 373.47 square meters in the underground floor (P6 floor) and the exclusive area No. 525.4 square meters in the underground (P5 floor) among the neighborhood living facilities to be newly built by the Plaintiff, and Defendant C shall compensate for substitute land No. 1 on March 7, 2008.