(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.05.14 2018나2075222

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.05.14 2018나2075222

손해배상(기)

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the claim for publication of an known letter is modified as follows.

The defendant is a judgment of this court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the reasoning of the judgment, is the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the reasoning of this case is written or added as follows. Thus, it shall be cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

6 The portion of "the result of the expert I's appraisal, the result of the on-site inspection by this Court" of the first line shall be "the result of the expert I's appraisal by the first instance court and the result of the on-site inspection by the court of first instance."

16 The part of the 14 line "within seven days after the service of this decision" shall be read as "within seven days after this decision became final and conclusive".

17.The following shall be added to the 17th line:

"In the lawsuit, the defendant is obligated to post the notice of the notice in the separate sheet No. 1 on the initial page B (C) within 7 days from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, and the plaintiff is obligated to pay damages of KRW 10 million and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Affiliation B from November 29, 2016 to the date of complete payment following the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case to the plaintiff."

2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims shall be dismissed as there is no reasonable ground.

Among the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the claim for publication of an allimination is unfair. As such, this part is modified as above, and the remaining parts of the judgment of first instance are justifiable with this conclusion. As such, both the plaintiff's appeal and the defendant's remaining appeal are dismissed as it is without merit. The plaintiff's claim extended

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-대전고등법원 2018.11.28 2017나15544

-수원고등법원 2020.11.12 2020나12345

-대전고등법원 2019.01.16 2018나12429

-대전고등법원(청주) 2020.02.18 2019나37

-서울고등법원 2019.12.10 2018누72132