logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.10.12 2018고단2553
병역법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

On October 24, 2012, when the Defendant was aware that he was able to be exempted from military service due to correspondence after being issued a physical judgment of class 3 active duty service on the grounds that the Defendant’s right chests and right shoulders, etc. from the Military Manpower Administration, and that he was able to be exempted from military service due to correspondence, the Defendant was provided with sentence on the part of the Defendant’s body, except for the face of the two arms and legs, and the two legs, etc., at the home located in Suwon City from April 2014 to May 2014 to be exempted from military service.

After that, on December 19, 2017, the Defendant received a re-examination of the military service by the Gyeongwon-si Military Manpower Administration, which was located in 120, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon Military Manpower Administration, and received a reduction of and exemption from military service due to telegraph text.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged his body with the intention of evading or being exempted from military service.

Maz.

1. The fact that the Defendant, from April 2014 to May 2014, 201, received an additional procedure to put his body in the previous body as a whole, but it was merely a good letter, and it was not for the purpose of having his military service reduced or exempted.

2. There is also doubt that the defendant was not subject to reduction or exemption of military service from the fact that he was judged as a public duty personnel of Grade 4 in a physical examination again received after being judged as a person in Grade 3 in active duty service due to a physical part of the defendant's body.

However, in light of the following circumstances revealed by the record, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone that the Defendant’s additional grammatic procedure was aimed at reducing or exempting military service.

There is insufficient evidence to acknowledge it and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

A. The Defendant, who was in the second grade of middle school in 2007, entered one’s door on the shoulder part of the shoulder, such as right, and was in the shape of a shooting on the left side in 2009, a high school’s first grade.

arrow