logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원김천지원 2017.07.21 2017가합189
건물명도(인도) 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From February 1, 2017, the above A

subsection (b).

Reasons

1. On October 13, 2014, the Plaintiff indicated the claim that the Defendant leased real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) to the Defendant with a deposit amounting to KRW 93,00,000, KRW 9,300,000 per month, and KRW 9,30,000 per year, and KRW 2 years for the lease term. However, on April 4, 2017, the Defendant delayed to pay rent for the two-year period and terminated the said lease agreement.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver to the Plaintiff the instant real estate, which is the leased object, to pay the overdue rent from February 1, 2017 to the termination date of the said lease agreement, and to pay the Defendant the amount of money at the rate of KRW 9,300,000 per month, each of which is the unjust enrichment that the Defendant occupied the instant real estate without any legal cause from the date of delivery of the instant real estate

2. Article 208 (3) 2 and Article 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act that is deemed a confession.

arrow