logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.04.20 2016고단266
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of CMW automobiles.

On December 16, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car at a speed of 17:35, the Defendant driven the above car and driven the road in front of the luminous distance along the center of the common road in Young-gu, Young-gu, Sigwon, with three-lanes from the middle school in the middle of the year to the apartment zone on the world side of the e-string road.

In this case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed for the person engaged in driving the motor vehicle and thoroughly see the situation, and to prevent the accident in advance by driving the motor vehicle in accordance with the new subparagraph.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the victim to go beyond the road by shocking the front part of the above BMW car, which was the victim D (the 66 years old) crossing the road from the sloping on the sloping side to the small and medium enterprise support center by negligence.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim, to the right pelle executives in need of approximately 12 weeks medical treatment.

2. The public prosecutor instituted the instant public prosecution by applying Article 3(1), proviso 2, proviso 1, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act to the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant was found to have shocked the victim at the crosswalk installed before the intersection when the signal at the intersection is red. However, according to each of the above evidences, the defendant was investigated by the police and proceeded along the three-lanes to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the road. However, the defendant stated to the effect that the pedestrian signal at the above crosswalk installed before the intersection is red and cannot be seen by pedestrians. The three-lanes of the above road are exclusive lanes for the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right

arrow