Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On March 11, 2017, the Defendant, at D office located in Kimcheon-si C around 10:32 on March 11, 2017, took the kitchen knife (No. 1, No. 31cm in length) which is a dangerous thing located in the office, and made intimidation as if he were blick and blicked by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. The protocol and statement concerning the suspect interrogation of each police officer regarding E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal death (to attach a kitchen and a kitchen-car photograph), investigation report (to attach CCTV photographs and CDs);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of special intimidation) and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. On March 11, 2017, the Defendant, at the D office located in Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si around 10:30 on March 11, 2017, caused the victim’s sexual organ twice by hand, and caused the victim’s bodily injury to the victim by taking the victim’s left hand hand over about four weeks of medical treatment.

2. The main evidence that corresponds to the facts charged in this part of the judgment has been made in the investigation agency and the court, but it is difficult to believe that the statement is in fact in light of the following circumstances.

In addition, the evidence submitted to the prosecution, such as E's written diagnosis, alone, is proved to the extent that this part of the facts charged is beyond a reasonable doubt.

It is difficult to see it.

(1) Even though the criminal investigation agency recognizes the fact that the victim's sexual organ has been fluored up to this court, the criminal defendant makes a consistent statement with him/her that he/she has inflicted an injury on the victim by taking away his/her left hand.

② On March 11, 2017, E, on the day of the instant case, when being investigated by the police, the Defendant did not make a statement to the effect that “the Defendant took away the left hand.”