(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.12.21 2018고단2532

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.12.21 2018고단2532

절도등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On September 8, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court) and completed the execution of the sentence on December 14, 2017.

[2018 Highest 2532]

1. On June 8, 2018, around 03:45, the Defendant: (a) accessed the gaps in front of the building B in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul, by neglecting attention; and (b) accessed it to the victim C, thereby bringing about 150 of the Victim C, which was in front of the building at issue, of the market price of Samsung 70,000 KRW 70,000.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

[2018 Highest 2727]

2. On June 20, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 15:55, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by the force of approximately seven minutes, including the victim’s hand, in a F cafeteria operated by the victim E of the 1st floor in Jung-gu Seoul, Central Government; (b) the victim demanded to change the food value; and (h) the b) the b) the b) the b) the b) the b) the table with his hand, and the h (i) the h (i.e., the same year with the business registration certificate; (b) the h) the b) the b) the b) the b) the b) the b

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, ordered her bbbling as if the Defendant would normally pay the victim E food value.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay food values.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, obtained 9,000 won or more of the market price from the victim, i.e., the victim, who was 1 to boomed with 1 to 200,000 won.

[2018 Highest 3457]

4. On August 11, 2018, the Defendant, despite having no capacity and intent to pay the price, took the same attitude that the Defendant would normally pay the price in the H restaurant located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul. On the other hand, the Defendant ordered the victim I to pay the price in a normal manner, and ordered the victim I to pay the price in an amount equivalent to KRW 1 1/4,000 in the market price of KRW 1/3,900 in the Jin-gu, Seoul.

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2018.04.18 2018고단45

-서울남부지방법원 2018.12.20 2018고단4051

-서울북부지방법원 2013.05.10 2013고단467

-서울북부지방법원 2018.05.10 2018고단379

-울산지방법원 2018.07.12 2018고단1526