logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.12.11 2015고단6872
철도안전법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 30, 2015, the Defendant violated the Railroad Safety Act: (a) around October 23, 2015, at the end station platform of subway 1, subway lines located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, 55, the subway security officers, etc., who were patroled to maintain the order in the station, show the Defendant out of the store; (b) while taking a bath to C, the chest part of his chest part was taken one time as head, and assaulted 10 times the part of the ship and bridge part.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order of railroad workers.

2. When the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender for the foregoing crime on October 31, 2015, and was transferred to a criminal room at the Seoul Jongno-gu Police Station located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul. Around 00:20 on October 31, 2015, the Defendant expressed that “the victim D, who is the circumstances belonging to the above police station in charge of the Defendant’s case, expressed that “the victim D, who is the circumstance belonging to the above police station, has a large number of petitioners, who is fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor of the police at any time, and who is fluor of the bit

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Each statement of E, F, and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of the contents of motion pictures);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 78 (1), 49 (2) of the Railroad Safety Act (a point of interfering with the performance of duties by railroad workers), Article 311 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Among concurrent offenders, the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope added up with long-term sentences) are as follows: (a) Defendant was sentenced to a suspension of the execution of four months on September 10, 2015 and was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a crime such as obstruction of business; and (b) Defendant’s insultd police officers to the police station in the subway station until he went through the police station; and (c) the nature of the crime is as follows: (a) Defendant, who is active, has served the same kind of crime in addition to the judgment of the said suspension of the execution.

arrow