1. As to the Plaintiff’s portion of the real estate indicated in the separate sheet, Defendant C, D, E, F, G, and H, Defendant B’s portion of each 1/7, and Defendant B’s portion of each 3/7.

1. Defendant B, I, J, K, and L did not have the substance of the Plaintiff’s clan, and the general assembly held on April 2, 2017 by the Plaintiff’s clan did not go through legitimate convening procedures to bring the instant lawsuit. Thus, the Plaintiff’s clan asserts to the effect that the Plaintiff’s clan did not have the standing to be a party.

The following circumstances, which can be recognized by the overall purport of each statement and pleading of evidence Nos. 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16, the following circumstances, namely, ① The plaintiff clan established the clan regulations from around 1970 at the latest with the descendants of the clan that consists of the descendants of the clan members, and amended the past regulations on January 1, 201 each year.

1. 1. The general meeting is held; 1. It appears that it had been in substance as an organization such as holding a meeting to set up for the first time of Eul, and that it had been held; 2. from around 1990 to the network N, the father of L, Defendant B, I, J, K, and L, the father of L, the head of the clan, led the clan in 1993, and the members of the clan had been in the lead of the clan in 193; 3) it appears that it had been difficult to attend the meeting of the clan held on January 1, 2006 and disburse the expenses for the clan; 4) it appears that it was difficult for Defendant B to find out some of its past activities such as attending the meeting of the plaintiff clan held on January 1, 201 with the deceased N, and that it was difficult for the plaintiff B to call the meeting, and 5) it appears that it was difficult for the plaintiff B to be in the process of convening the meeting, and that it appears that it had not been other for the plaintiff B's members.