Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On April 22, 2008, the Plaintiff joined the Defendant and worked as the vice president, and retired on December 31, 2013.
B. On March 1, 2010, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a labor contract with the terms that the annual salary shall be determined as KRW 132,475,00 on March 1, 201 through February 28, 2011, and that 12/14 shall be paid in equal installments in the annual salary, and 2/14 shall be paid in equal installments in March, June, 9, and 12, and no new labor contract was concluded until the Plaintiff retires.
C. Since 2010, the Defendant’s management, including the Plaintiff, made a resolution to reduce part of the bonus and salary of all executives and employees on October 201 (hereinafter “the instant resolution”) following the Defendant’s resolution to reduce the bonus and salary of all executives and employees (hereinafter “instant reduction resolution”).
In accordance with the instant reduction resolution, the Defendant received a written consent for wage change from all employees below the full-class position, and the content thereof is not paid the bonus ( March, June, September, September, and December) in 2011, and the salary has been reduced by 80% from November, 201 to February, 2012.
‘' was the content. D.
Since March 2012, the defendant did not pay bonuses, but decided to increase the reduced wage in part, and paid the employees.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 6 evidence, Eul 10 to 23 evidence (including numbers for each type of evidence), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The parties' assertion
A. The plaintiff's assertion was not subject to the resolution of the reduction in this case exceptionally because he had been engaged in key duties in the defendant.
Nevertheless, the Defendant did not pay to the Plaintiff the amount equivalent to 2/14 of the annual salary to be paid in equal installments in March, June, September, and December, 201, 201, 2012, and 2013. Therefore, the amount stated in the purport of the claim corresponding thereto should be paid to the Plaintiff.
B. According to the Defendant’s argument reduction resolution, all officers and employees, including the Defendant’s representative director, are bonus.