A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 26, 2018, the Defendant entered into a contract for waste transportation and disposal services at the site of remodeling construction work for "Friet" located in the KUyang-gun E with the KUyang-gun, and carried out the said work.

However, the above LIM did not pay the service fees, and the victim G, the representative of the LIMF, who operates the said LIM, did not pay the service fees, and did not pay the service fees, and did not pay the service fees to the above LIM, which is the owner of the LIMF.

1. Around 17:00 on June 10, 2018, the Defendant destroyed the building No. 203 by setting fire to the said guest room by setting fire to the Friart E located in Gangseoyang-gun, which was used by himself/herself, persons related to cooking and other subcontractors, and his/her family members for lodging.

Accordingly, the defendant destroyed a building used as a residence by a person.

2. Around June 10, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the business affairs of the victim G office located in the second floor of the instant Lart, the second floor of the instant Lart, and interfered with the victim’s new Lart construction and Lart management by force, such as gathering, and collecting, on the books, various documents kept in the said management office on the ground that the damaged person did not pay the service cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Statement made by the witness H in the second public trial record;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Determination as to the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion in relation to the obstruction of business affairs, such as photographs, field photographs, and fire identification results

1. The summary of the assertion is Friart D, which is not completed, and thus does not constitute “a building used as a residence or existing building”, and the Defendant did not recognize that the above building was “a building used as a residence or existing building” at the time of committing the instant crime.

2. Determination.