The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below seems to have taken into account the motive and circumstances leading to each of the crimes of this case, even though the defendant recognized the errors of the defendant as a whole, and there seems to be some circumstances to take into account the motive and circumstances leading to each of the crimes of this case. However, in light of the method and frequency of each of the crimes of this case, the punishment of the defendant is too unfair, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the victim of each of the crimes of this case did not receive a letter from the victims due to compensation for damages or agreement with the victims; and (b) the defendant did not receive a letter of relief from the victims; and (c) other circumstances, such as the situation before and after the commission of each of the crimes of this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, occupation and family relation, etc., the punishment of the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.

(However, among the summary of the evidence of the lower judgment, the "each police protocol against V, U, and R" in the column 2015 Highest 2931 is "1. The police protocol against U and R"

1. Since it is obvious that it is a clerical error in the fifth written statement, it is corrected to correct it ex officio in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure.

.