logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.11.21 2018고정475
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person of the 2018 High 475 shall transfer any access medium for electronic financial transactions.

Nevertheless, on January 3, 2016, the Defendant, via the Kakakao Stockholm, proposed that “on the basis of the transfer of a physical card connected to the account, one million won will be paid” from the person who was not the name of the organization that caused the fraud of the telephone finance, and around that time, the Defendant sent one physical card connected to the Defendant’s name to the article of Kwikset Service, which was linked to the Defendant’s personal compromise account (Account Number: B) on the front of the building of the Nohia located in the upper part of the record of the Nohia City, Ansan-si, 28.

Accordingly, the Defendant transferred the electronic financial transaction access media to another person.

"2018 High 476" Defendant accepted the loan through the Internet with a proposal to allow the loans to be granted if it is transferred by opening a legal account from a person in an infinite name.

On August 27, 2015, the Defendant opened a national bank account (D) under the name of a limited company C in Daejeon around August 27, 2015, and then transferred the passbook and the check card to the nameless person, and notified him of the password.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 High 475"

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. The execution reply to a warrant of search and seizure inspection (applicable mutatis mutandis to the financial account) 2018 fixed 475;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 49 (4) 1 and Article 6 (3) 1 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions and the Selection of Punishment for the Crime, Articles 49 (4) 1 and 6 (3) 1 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions and the Selection of Fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow