beta
Text
The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 31,915,762, and KRW 20,00,100 among them, from May 27, 2014, and KRW 11,915,62.
Reasons
Basic Facts
On August 2012, the Plaintiff entered the Defendant Company and was working on the Defendant Company. On September 16, 2013, around 17:35, the Plaintiff was trying to remove the product in a bad list on the packing machine (hereinafter “instant machine”) while carrying out the Defendant’s business of packing and inferior inspection of the products. The Plaintiff suffered injury on the left-hand hand, i.e., the upper-hand hand-hand hand of the products, i.e., the upper-hand hand-hand 3, 4 middle-water dykes, 3 middle-water dykes, and water dykes.
(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident.” The instant machine has a phrase stating safety rules to the effect that “after mechanical cleaning or removing defective goods, it shall be conducted at the time of mechanical suspension.” While the Defendant Company conducted various safety education on the same content, it did not have any device, such as a sensitive safety center, etc., where the instant machine enters the body of the workers, and its operation is automatically suspended.
After the accident of this case, the Defendant established a sudden stop center.
[Based on the fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 1 and 3 (including numbers), the records and images of this Court, the results of the physical appraisal commission to the director of the Khee University Hospital of this Court, and the fact that the defendant, the user, etc., is liable for the damages of the whole purport of the pleadings, based on the fact that the work environment is safe and maintained through the installation of a reduction response safety center or other safety devices, and the defendant, the user, etc., has a duty of care to thoroughly and thoroughly supervise the safety education and supervision of the plaintiff et al., thereby preventing the accident. Thus, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident in this case.
However, as seen earlier, the above safety rules are attached to the instant machinery.