logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.09.29 2016노1570
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, at the time of the accident, knew that there was an accident with the victim, and that there was an accident by reporting CCTV at a police station.

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (the penalty amounting to five million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the records revealed as to the assertion of factual mistake as follows. In other words, the defendant, while driving a sea-going vehicle owned by the natives, to which the automobile insurance for himself is not applicable, was changed from the two-lanes to the one-lanes on the road in the accident, the back part of the victim's vehicle driving, which changed the vehicle line from the two-lanes to the one-lanes on the left side of the driver's side of the vehicle, and shock into the part of the vehicle's steering gate, the defendant was asked whether the defendant was at the seat of the victim, and the defendant was at the seat of the victim, and the false name, resident registration number, cell phone number (38 pages of the trial record of the court below at the first trial date of the court below) was written, and as to the reason or circumstance that the defendant notified the victim of the false personal information as above, the police thought that the accident occurred, and that the victim's contact with the victim will not be seen as annoy contact.

After having made a statement to the effect that it is “(57 pages of the evidence record)” and in the appellate brief, “when the phone number is set, the Defendant thought that he was the Defendant’s telephone number after the accident, but he was late aware that his phone number was not the Defendant’s telephone number.”

I think the end of the crime.

It has intentionally written any telephone number.

arrow