logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.08.14 2014가단5070453
부당이득금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On April 21, 2008, Defendant A entered into a contract for the sale price of KRW 4770 million with the terminated 32 square household units from among the sales households of the instant apartment units to purchase KRW 700,000,00,000 from the date of the establishment of the Do Housing Association (hereinafter “instant apartment”) as an agent of the Hando Housing Association (hereinafter “instant apartment”), which was newly constructed on the upper Do Housing Association and 78 parcels of land in Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Dongjak-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “instant apartment”), and Defendant A, as if Defendant A was a member of the Do Housing Association, after the establishment of the Do Housing Association, as it was retroactively prepared in 202 and obtained membership status by taking account of the method of obtaining membership status (hereinafter “instant apartment units”). Defendant A paid 400,000,000 won for the housing construction by the date of the sale price.

However, as in the case of Defendant A, if the Housing Construction Co., Ltd. entered into a sales contract in excess of the unsold number of households of the apartment of this case by giving its membership status retroactively to the applicants for the sale of the apartment of this case as in the case of Defendant A, the sales contract was concluded, and even if the same type of apartment of this case was all divided, Defendant A was not allocated the same, it was impossible for Defendant A to acquire the ownership of

On the other hand, where C is liable for damage under the Business Affairs of Licensed Real Estate Agents and Report of Real Estate Transactions Act (hereinafter “Licensed Real Estate Agent Act”), as it causes property damage to a transaction party in the course of conducting real estate brokerage activities by the Plaintiff around February 15, 2007, C is obligated to provide a mutual aid agreement to compensate for damage suffered by the transaction party within the limit of KRW 50 million (hereinafter “instant mutual aid agreement”).

arrow