The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On November 16, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor and one year of suspended execution due to special larceny, etc. from the Suwon Giwon, which became final and conclusive on November 24, 2017.

No one may intermediate a third party's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator, or provide such services for communications of a third party.

On January 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) provided C with four mobile phone mobile phones (E,F, G, and H) and two phone calls for the purpose of telecommunication for the phishing crime by providing C with a photograph and identification card containing one million won in the form of his/her identification card, on the condition that he/she would pay the unpaid amount of the mobile phone to a person with no identification card; and (b) among them, E was provided for the purpose of telecommunication for the phishing crime.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant's provision of identification cards to open his/her cell phone, but there is no fact that the defendant allowed him/her to open his/her cell phone other than his/her cell phone.

As shown in the facts charged in the instant case, there are reports on internal investigation (the nominal account holder I’s statement), J Communications Answer (A), L dialogue content with I and K, D, C, M Communications Answer (A), investigation report (A), investigation report (A), and investigation report (request for attendance of witness A).

Comprehensively taking account of the foregoing, the Defendant’s name: (a) contacted I with a person using a mobile phone of the E number opened around January 24, 2017 that I lent the account and e-mail card; (b) accordingly, the access media provided by I was used for the fraud crime; and (c) year in the name of the Defendant

1. The fact that the cell phone number F, G, and H was opened from around 31 to February 2, 2017, and the E number among them was terminated on May 12, 2017, and the F and G number was terminated on May 16, 2017, and the Defendant’s number used on around 2017 was N.

Comprehensively taking account of the above facts of recognition, the police officers from January 201 to February 201.