logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2018.01.05 2017고단288
폐기물관리법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 20,000,000 won, and the defendant corporation B shall be punished by a fine of 5,000,000 won, respectively.

Defendant

A above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the actual representative of corporation B, and the defendant corporation B is a corporation with the objective of collecting aggregate.

1. No person who is a defendant shall reclaim or incinerate wastes at a place other than the waste disposal facilities permitted, approved, or reported by the competent authorities;

Nevertheless, from April 7, 2017 to September 1, 2017, the Defendant buried approximately 1,125 tons of inorganic trucks 25 tons, which are industrial wastes generated in Gyeong-gun, Sinnam-gun, Inc., a place of business located in Gyeong-gun, Busan-gun, without obtaining permission from the competent authority, etc. for the number of Sho-gun, which is not a waste reclamation area, into the site of sand gathering owned by B, which is located in Gyeong-gun, Sinnam-gun, Sinnam-gun.

As such, the Defendant buried wastes without permission from the competent authorities at a place other than waste disposal facilities.

2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. violated the Waste Management Act by reclaiming wastes without permission at a place, other than waste disposal facilities, at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Each statement of the F;

1. Accusations filed by the number of hold-guns, and accusations filed against the waste management offender;

1. Notification of removal of wastes within the collection site of earth and rocks, official gazettes, and border photographs;

1. A copy of the certificate of report filed by the person discharging industrial wastes, and a list of shareholders;

1. Each site photograph, a written notification of completion of removal of wastes, and five copies of the site photograph [the Defendants and the Defendant’s defense counsel, and the Defendant’s defense counsel, Defendant A’s bringing wastewater treatment sludge (hereinafter “the instant sludge”) into the collection site of the earth and rocks, Inc., the Defendant Company B located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun (hereinafter “the collection site of the earth and rocks”). However, the aforementioned evidence argues to the effect that: (a) bringing the Defendant Company A into the collection site of the earth and rocks (hereinafter “the instant sludge”); (b) it was merely the temporary mix before mixing with earth and sand for recycling; and (c)

arrow