Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and for a defendant B, for six months, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant A, around 07:40 on May 21, 2017, at the former office of the Defendant’s wife D located in Jinju-si around 07:40 on May 21, 2017, found to have his or her children under the influence of alcohol, but he or she was found to have his or her children under the influence of alcohol from D.
“A police officer belonging to the Jinju E District Police Station, who was called up after receiving a report from 112 during a large sound and being disturbed, demanded the Defendant to leave the said house, and assaulted the Defendant, i.e., the f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’, his f’s f’s f’s
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 reporting processing affairs.
『2017 고단 719』 피고인 A은 2017. 8. 9. 00:15 경 경남 진주시 G에 있는 피해자 H이 운영하는 ‘I 주점 ’에서 술에 취하여 성명 불상의 손님에게 “ 야 이 씹할 놈 아, 개새끼야, 뭘 쳐 다 보 노, 죽여 버릴까!
“The victim’s market price in which the victim’s possession was frightened and frightened, shacking the disturbance by breaking two in his hand, thereby getting the customers in that place.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the main business of the victim by force and damaged the property owned by the victim.
Defendant B is a person who had a total of four times of punishment for the same offense, including a fine of one million won for fraud in the support of the Gwangju District Court in September 30, 2016, a fine of one million won for the same offense in the same court on October 31, 2016, and a fine of one million won for the same offense in the Jinwon District Court on December 30, 2016, and a summary order of one million won for the same offense from the Jinwon District Court on December 30, 2016.
[Criminal facts]
1. On July 2, 2017, at around 22:00, the Defendants issued an order for alcohol and alcohol as if they would have paid the amount to the victims at the main point of the operation of the Victim K in J in J in J in J in J in J in J in J in J in J in J in J.
However, the Defendants are true.