Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of six months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On August 21, 2014, at around 19:30, the Defendant made a false statement to the police officer who was requested to ask questions about the traffic accident circumstances and to take a drinking test from the Gangseo Police Station C district unit of the Gangnam Police Station, a police officer belonging to the Gangnam Police Station, who was dispatched to the site after having received a traffic accident report in front of the Gangnam Police Station, and called “I do not drive the vehicle at home, I do not see that I do not drive the vehicle at home, I do so, and assault the above D with his left hand, and interfere with the legitimate performance of the police officer’s official duties.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation of traffic accidents and the measurement of drinking alcohol by police officers.

B. On August 21, 2014, at around 19:53, the Defendant was demanded to respond to the measurement of alcohol by inserting approximately 25 minutes in a drinking measuring instrument three times between approximately 25 minutes, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that he/she was driving under the influence of alcohol from the slope F belonging to the said district unit, such as smelling, snicking, snicking, etc., at the district unit of the Gangnam Police Station C (Seoul) located in Gangnam-si, Gangnam-si.

Nevertheless, the Defendant refused to comply with a police officer’s request for sobage measurement by avoiding the method of putting the breath-man into a drinking measuring instrument, without justifiable grounds.

2. Defendant B: (a) around 19:30 on August 21, 2014, the Defendant: (b) 19:30 on the day on which the Defendant was working in front of the Yung Military Branch; and (c) 1. A.

In order to open the door of the police vehicle, it was arrested in the act of crime such as the same crime, and the police vehicle was removed from G (the age of 48) who is a police officer belonging to the Gangnam Police Station C district unit in Gangnam Police Station.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the above G with his hand to force the above G to force the above police officer's proper performance of official duties.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in the act of committing a crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police officer with regard to G, D, and H.