logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.10.26 2018나55831
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the addition of the judgment on a new argument in the defendant’s trial at the court of first instance to the judgment, and thus, the reasoning of the judgment is as stated in the part of the reasoning of the judgment of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with

2. The part added by the Defendant: (a) notified the Plaintiff that the right to claim the insurance benefit arising from the instant insured event expires by two-year prescription pursuant to Article 662 of the former Commercial Act (amended by Act No. 12397, Mar. 11, 2014); (b) the Defendant was obligated to assist the Plaintiff in receiving the insurance benefit before the right to claim the insurance benefit expires by prescription; and (c) the Plaintiff did not comply with the foregoing; (d) the Plaintiff’s assertion that the statute of limitations defense is unreasonable; (e) however, it is difficult to recognize that the Plaintiff

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow