1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a corporation that is entrusted with the industrial accident compensation insurance business by the Minister of Employment and Labor pursuant to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act. 2) The Pacific Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the Pacific Machinery Technology”) is the owner of the industrial accident compensation insurance subscribers and E-vehicles (hereinafter “the instant vehicle”). C is the driver of the instant vehicle as a staff member of the Pacific Machinery Technology, and A and B are the same passengers and victims of the instant vehicle as a staff member of the Pacific Machinery Technology.

3) The Defendant is a comprehensive insurer of the instant vehicle. (b) The occurrence of the instant accident is around 20:20 on March 7, 2012, C: (a) driven the instant vehicle while driving the instant vehicle onto A and B, and driving the instant vehicle on the front of the plaza-dong 11, Chungcheongnam-dong, Seoul, which is in front of the plaza-dong 11, to turn back to the left at the right slope. On the other hand, the instant vehicle collisioned the F vehicle, which was going to the middle line, and was going to the left at the right slope of the sloping-distance gate located at the right slope-distance gate, and then A suffered injury, such as an injury, such as an anti-surging to the left end, a back to the left end, and an injury, such as an anti-surging, etc., to B (hereinafter “instant accident”).

A person shall be appointed.

C. By March 22, 2013, the Plaintiff recognized the instant accident as an occupational accident, and paid KRW 1,527,840 for medical care benefits, KRW 11,098,920 for temporary layoff benefits, KRW 13,490 for disability benefits, KRW 13,490 for disability benefits, KRW 8,643,380 for medical care benefits, KRW 13,096,930 for temporary layoff benefits, and KRW 39,748,50 for disability benefits, respectively.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 6, 7, 12, 13, Eul evidence No. 1-7, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The defendant's liability for damages

A. According to the above facts, the defendant is liable for damages caused by the instant accident to A and B as the insurer of the instant vehicle.

B. The defendant's assertion A and B as to the limitation of liability are on the instant vehicle.